Categories
Art Artist and Mother Board Cultural Studies

Women of our Century – Paule Vézelay (Notes from BBC programme)

Women of our Century – BBC Iplayer

Series 1: Paule Vézelay

Paule Vezelay was one of the first British artists to explore abstraction. At a time when British society was suspicious of modernism, Vezelay became familiar with the ideas of European modernists and forged a significant place for herself among early abstractionists. In addition to being an important painter and sculptor, Vezelay was an illustrator, writer and textile designer.

(Biography – http://jlwcollection.com/jlwcollection.com/Paule_Vezelay.html)

First transmitted in 1984, Germaine Greer interviews pioneer abstract artist Paule Vézelay.

British painter Vézelay was neglected and ignored by the British art establishment for most of her long life, but she can claim to be Britain’s first abstract artist. She was born Margery Watson-Williams in Bristol in 1892, and changed her name when she went to live and work in Paris in 1926. Her studio was a street away from Picasso’s, and she was part of the group of artists who contributed to the revolution in modern art of the 1920s.

 She has some interesting things to say – Notes from the programme:

Refer to yourself as a man, never refer to myself as a man, although it certainly would been easier if I was a man

Did she do this because she didn’t want sex to come into the equation

Added the e – suggests feminine

 

What’s important is the work – is it original, well done

Knew exactly what she wanted to do

 

Didn’t want to be treated as a beginner at the slade

Independent

 

Looking for

 

Got to do a lot of thinking if you want to do something new. The more you think about it the more it changes

Got to work hard at art to be an artist

Got to be able to control it with your hand

Draw you line – the line must be right before you even draw it

 

Exactly as you intend it to be

 

Rhythm of line and mass

Curves – why limit yourself to straight lines

Why limit yourself when can have curves and straight

Suspended line in space – the first

Already formed before knew about their work – influence of artists who came to see

 

All the young men danced with – were killed in the 1st world war

 

Think would had a conflict – glad you escaped? (Love marriage)

 

Nice for women to have babies, most women want babies

Mr right man

Wasn’t in love with ones who asked

Encouraged? Parent’s dad yes

 

Men

Andre Masson – engaged – declaration of intention – changed mind – painful

Fruitful?

It was pleasant,

Who knows his work –?

Hans Arp, who had become a close friend

Great friendship with them both

Influenced each other – yes I think did

Identify with that group – did it help?

Although didn’t discuss it much – work was supposed to do that don’t you see

Why abstract artists keep form – see what others doing, draw or paint because can’t put into words what want to say

 

Do you think you communicated without words – ‘well it’s easier to write, not easy to choose, but to drawing takes time to get it exactly right

 

Paul Nash

In order to praise has to say nasty things about unnamed artists

 

Problem that family is your responsibility

 

After the war – able to pick up where left off

50 years old – Paris

Abstraction not understood in Britain

 

What u find pleasing in their lives and form

Directly to the emotions – language appeals directly to emotion

Joy

Enough sadness in real life

Joyful happy pleasing

As they used to

Worst thing – GG – book on women and painting ref.

Student/teacher

Worst – that he would fall in love with you

Safe – sunk if marries

Can’t make rules about it – doesn’t matter

You don’t think of that in advance

For most married women it phases out

Great mistake for a women to marry if she wants to be an artist

On marriage – women artists – if they marry their work gets phased out because ‘they don’t have the time or energy to take their work seriously’ – how can be expected to succeed with ‘

Often women if they marry, have children, their work inevitably gets phased out, takes a back seat because they ‘Don’t have the time or energy to take their work seriously’

How can I be expected to succeed with ‘One hand in the kitchen, one in the studio’! Gwen John

Concentrated, self-possessed – almost arrogant about painting

Ask about wives of artists who are artists themselves

Sophie Tauber-Arp – How can I be expected to succeed with ‘One hand in the kitchen, one in the studio’

Been greater if hadn’t married – came to see Arp – didn’t come to see her

In the end – she was asked to design for print –

Textiles – feminising women’s art – Issue?

What percentage still got – rather be with it rather than the sake of selling it cheaply – I like my paintings

Faith in yourself – never been shaken

Opinion I value – certain amount of confidence

Happy life? – Don’t know what mean by happy – did what wanted to do – names shit jibs

Satisfied u – up to a point

Beyond? – learn as you go along…

 

 

Categories
Daily Life Just Jaxx Having a Rant

Put an end to retailers categorising toys according to gender

The Entertainer takes down gendered signage – article

Great news and good progress made towards putting an end to retailers categorising toys according to gender. Toy retailer, The Entertainer has re categorised the toys it sells and will no longer use gender specific signage. Hooray!

I’ve been banging on about this for years, basically it boils down to blatant gender stereotyping. It’s rife when you think about it.

Labelling toys as pink or blue, girls or boys. Separate aisles for what’s classed as boys or girls toys. Pushing children (and parents) towards objects of play, ways to behave, things to do, that have been decided are for either girls or boys, not both.  Thus reinforcing stereotypes of what it is to be male or female, right from the off. The Early Learning Centre. This is where it all starts. The rot sets in and girls begin their towards the sparkly world of looking pretty, acting dumb and becoming a princess.

Can’t bear the way they have aisles of pink packaged fluff for girls and label construction or making toys as blue so girls don’t want them because they’re boys toys. In the early years children are oblivious to this, everything is an object to explore, yet to be labelled, everything’s potentially a toy! It’s adults, society that apply the labels and supply the constructs of signified meaning of what the object is.

Children are mirrors and copycats, they want to do as we do, they copy each other and are particularly interested in what the elder ones are doing. This appears to have more sway than what gender the toys are stereotyped as.

They may well develop favourites, but its ‘us’ that decides they are into it because they are a boy, or a girl. Having grown up with society’s constructs on how to behave, parents may well encourage play with the toys that reinforce their child’s gender, over another, that labels their child as a ‘tomboy’ or ‘cissy.’ My sister once said, why do you always give my kids toys that involve sticks, because they always end up fighting with them.

My daughter went from playing with all sorts of bits and bobs, including the predominantly vehicle and construction based hand-me-down toys My youngest has the pick of the bunch as he’s got all the things they barely played with anyway, Im glad they get another chance of use. And it happens that the best kept and plentiful collections are those of his father. As in his day, kids took care of their toys. Personally I’d rather suggest playing with the Matchbox vehicles too.

He also watches the older ones on various digital games which are predominantly about ‘taking things out.’ So whether annihilating opponents or blowing things up, this invokes excitement from the otherwise occupied siblings. So it’s no wonder the little one shouts out ‘Sire!’ This cracks me up.

Forced between choosing a a pink or a blue low level table once in The Early Learning Centre, I muttered to myself, why don’t they have a yellow, or green, a non-gender-specific colour and thought how ridiculous that I knew my daughter would want the pink one of course, because blue is a boys colour. I bought a T shirt in a charity shop, for my daughter. I liked it because it was green and because it had a cool robot on it. When I got home I noticed the writing on it said, ‘only for boys’ , we both agreed this was stupid and she would wear it anyway, she liked robots too. Furthermore it served as a good example of ignoring the nonsense and playing, doing, wearing what you like. She’s getting it.

Need to sort out advertising and packaging design next.

Let children be children, and toys be toys. Let them decide what they want to play with…. which tends to be a computer or console from 5+ these days. Gaming world dead guilty of gender stereotyping too. I could go on, perhaps I will. Pleased in recent years to read others writing and campaigning on this now. Such as the Pink Stinks campaign, (what was that book?) Keep up the good work (will add contacts, groups, campaigns etc)

TBC… tired now and haven’t tidied the toys away yet!